Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

It’s Exhausting Being This Fabulous
Forum rules
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
Dennis
Admin
Posts: 9540
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Daddy DenDen
Country: Germany
Location: Hamburg
Contact:

Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Dennis » 12 May 2009, 16:22

Hey everyone!

Just a little reminder that due to an agreement with the Beckham's lawyers, you are not to post any pictures of the kids whatsoever. This includes links to sites that contain kids pictures too. Furthermore, please refrain from posting pictures that potentially invade the privacy of the Beckhams (like aerial shots of their home, paparazzi-pics from holidays etc).

We had them contact us again last week about a picture posted (even though it was removed by us within about 2 hours, which shows how they keep a really close eye on us), and frankly, I don't want to deal with their lawyers so frequently, so I'm asking you not to post such pictures in the first place and it's all nice and dandy. It might not always be against the law or always make sense to forbid these pictures, but we agreed with them not to have them on here period and that's how it is. You don't want to fight someone with a law company and a budget as big as theirs ;)

On an unrelated note, I would also like you to remember copyright laws apply in forums as well. Posting pictures from agencies etc on here directly is against the law as it breaks the copyright of the photographer / the licensing deals with the agencies - to avoid any legal problems, it would be much better if you just linked the original source where you found the pictures on (aka the page the pics were on, not just the jpgs directly). Same counts for news stories - just write a little summary and link to the original article instead of posting it on here.

Thanks for the attention! :)

-- Dennis
Alastair
Posts: 8934
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 19:12
Gender: Male
Custom Title: look over there
Country: United_Kingdom
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Alastair » 12 May 2009, 19:28

Okay :)
User avatar
Galore
Posts: 13857
Joined: 19 May 2006, 00:13
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Let Them Eat Kylie
Country: Canada
Location: *Vancouver*

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Galore » 12 May 2009, 19:44

You are on a roll with the stickies today! Dennis invasion!
Image
{the sparkle} the everygirl's guide to the good life: http://www.thesparkle.net
Dennis
Admin
Posts: 9540
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Daddy DenDen
Country: Germany
Location: Hamburg
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Dennis » 12 May 2009, 19:58

Galore wrote:You are on a roll with the stickies today! Dennis invasion!


I'm just craving for the attention :oops:
Tim
Posts: 9245
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Country: Niue

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Tim » 12 May 2009, 20:03

Strange that they don´t go after perezhilton.. He posts pictures of their kids frequently..
Dennis
Admin
Posts: 9540
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Daddy DenDen
Country: Germany
Location: Hamburg
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Dennis » 12 May 2009, 20:06

strange that they dont go after the original photographers / agencies. Anyhow, they're legally in the right not to want such pictures on here, so nothing we can do really other than try to cooperate.
Tim
Posts: 9245
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Country: Niue

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Tim » 12 May 2009, 20:08

:) Doing a good job Dennis!
User avatar
TheBiatches
Posts: 28105
Joined: 02 Apr 2006, 19:08
Gender: Male
Location: Barcelona (originally from Naples, Italy)

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby TheBiatches » 12 May 2009, 20:38

That's very strict, thanks for explaining, although i still think it's really stupid of them to have such an attitude with a fan forum.
Image
Aries
Posts: 1568
Joined: 29 Aug 2006, 22:28

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Aries » 12 May 2009, 21:12

It just feels like they beat up on the little guys. They don't want pictures posted here, meanwhile x17 has 10 minute videos of the kids playing by themselves, without their parents, on a playground. It makes no sense at all.
User avatar
*Sarah*
Posts: 6179
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Location: *England*
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby *Sarah* » 12 May 2009, 21:31

Aries wrote:It just feels like they beat up on the little guys. They don't want pictures posted here, meanwhile x17 has 10 minute videos of the kids playing by themselves, without their parents, on a playground. It makes no sense at all.



I know right talk about kicking one of the biggest fanbases in the head.If they do it for here they should do it everywhere.
Image
Margaret
Posts: 18844
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Margaret » 12 May 2009, 21:42

That was my fault wasn't it? :$
Image
[gb]
Posts: 5027
Joined: 21 Feb 2008, 14:23
Gender: Female
Custom Title: constant flirt
Country: United_States
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby [gb] » 12 May 2009, 22:13

Dennis wrote:
Galore wrote:You are on a roll with the stickies today! Dennis invasion!


I'm just craving for the attention :oops:


not enough people call you daddy this week? it puts me in a mood too :D
Image
Dennis
Admin
Posts: 9540
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Daddy DenDen
Country: Germany
Location: Hamburg
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Dennis » 12 May 2009, 22:37

Margaret wrote:That was my fault wasn't it? :$


It certainly was! They even asked for your details (IP-address and such), I assume for potential prosecution, but I declined giving it out as that would be a breech of data privacy laws.
Max Headroom
Banned
Posts: 8511
Joined: 20 Oct 2007, 14:44
Custom Title: BANNED
Country: United_Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Max Headroom » 12 May 2009, 22:38

Margaret wrote:That was my fault wasn't it? :$


Yes it was and you got away with it too. :despise:

Having been on this forum since day one you should of known the rules.

Thanks to Mama Dee who pulled the thread as soon as she came online.
I reported the violation but no mods who were online took any notice.
mel2vicem
Posts: 33809
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Country: Kuwait

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby mel2vicem » 12 May 2009, 22:39

Sounds like it has to do with copyright laws too, like last week when 19 told denden to remove some Geri professionally shot photos.
Dennis
Admin
Posts: 9540
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Daddy DenDen
Country: Germany
Location: Hamburg
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Dennis » 12 May 2009, 22:41

mel2vicem wrote:Sounds like it has to do with copyright laws too, like last week when 19 told denden to remove some Geri professionally shot photos.


actually, they claimed for breech of privacy (it was a professional picture taken when brooklyn was born and the photographer had it on his website in his portfolio, I assume he does have the copyright for it as he took it, but apparently it was only taken for "private use")
xElizabethx
Posts: 9266
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:47
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Elixabef
Country: United_States
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby xElizabethx » 12 May 2009, 23:35

Dennis wrote:
mel2vicem wrote:Sounds like it has to do with copyright laws too, like last week when 19 told denden to remove some Geri professionally shot photos.


actually, they claimed for breech of privacy (it was a professional picture taken when brooklyn was born and the photographer had it on his website in his portfolio, I assume he does have the copyright for it as he took it, but apparently it was only taken for "private use")


I think that's so silly. If it's publicly available picture on a website on the guy's website and all someone does is link to it, claiming breech of privacy seems a bit silly to me. Copyright issues I could understand. Do their lawyers just have too much time on their hands? :think: As has been said by others, I really think they do go after the wrong people.
megzluvsmelc
Posts: 13339
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 09:07
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Beautiful Mind
Country: Australia
Location: Melbourne/Victoria
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby megzluvsmelc » 13 May 2009, 06:53

So does it means that Im not allowed to post the pic of Victoria's niece? I mean I just scanned the mag from TAFE and it was from this week's issue!

Do I have to delete the pic? I hope u understand me. Lol
Image
xElizabethx
Posts: 9266
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:47
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Elixabef
Country: United_States
Location: Tampa, Florida
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby xElizabethx » 13 May 2009, 07:05

^Well, I don't know what position the uber-litigious lawyers would take, but I (unknowingly) posted a picture with Victoria's niece in it a year ago and I don't think there was any problem.

(Oh god, I'll probably be indicted over this post).
Last edited by xElizabethx on 13 May 2009, 07:19, edited 1 time in total.
Dennis
Admin
Posts: 9540
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Daddy DenDen
Country: Germany
Location: Hamburg
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Dennis » 13 May 2009, 07:15

to be on the safe side, dont post any family members maybe ;)

also, scanning in magazine-pages would go against the copyright of the magazine etc, read what i wrote about that above too :angel:
Margaret
Posts: 18844
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Margaret » 13 May 2009, 07:57

Oh well i shouldnt have posted it, i assumed it was for some magazine or something because why else would you put it online?
But i am very sorry to have caused problems, i didnt know they were personal pictures or anything.
Image
Vitalina
Posts: 10705
Joined: 02 Oct 2005, 12:23
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Yes I CAN
Country: United_States
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Vitalina » 13 May 2009, 08:15

I respect their wish for privacy, but it does seem that they fight against a small company becase they dare to. Go and shout at perezhilton and the stupid comments people leave on that website and leave DD alone
Image
User avatar
-TheMatrix-
Posts: 12223
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: I love You Keisha
Country: Italy
Location: FLORENCE, Italy

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby -TheMatrix- » 13 May 2009, 10:04

Vitalina wrote:I respect their wish for privacy, but it does seem that they fight against a small company becase they dare to. Go and shout at perezhilton and the stupid comments people leave on that website and leave DD alone


agree. I understand hey want to protect their kids and privacy (as much as possile) but I don't really understand why they have to be against a fan forum. We are fans, we love them... bah... anyway I'm ok with the rules.
Patricia
Posts: 7417
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Bittersweet

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Patricia » 13 May 2009, 10:43

same here, they should have emailed the photographer, not denden... weird
Image
Anthonypierards
Posts: 143
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 03:14
Gender: Male
Custom Title: The Fabulous MOI
Location: Geriwood
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Anthonypierards » 13 May 2009, 15:00

Well, I can understand them. Don't forget she did receive dead threaths for her and her children a few years back. Pictures start popping up here, but who knows where or with whom they end up. U only need one fucked up "fan" (due to a lack of a better word) to start all that shit again.

Return to “Victoria Beckham”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests