Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

It’s Exhausting Being This Fabulous
Forum rules
We would kindly like to remind you that due to a request of the Beckhams, pictures of their children are NOT allowed to be posted on the forums!
User avatar
Fighter
Posts: 13111
Joined: 10 Oct 2004, 17:32
Gender: Male

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Fighter » 22 Sep 2010, 00:51

This is one of the many many reasons why I've lost all respect for this woman.

Oh well, I still enjoy seeing stuff from years ago, and her old interviews still put a smile on my face.
User avatar
Drowned
Posts: 1885
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Stupid cupid
Location: Geriwood

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Drowned » 18 Dec 2012, 12:27

How can she forbid her fans to post pictures of the kids and then make Romeo the face of Burberry? No comments.
Image
User avatar
FiaSpice
Posts: 20938
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female
Custom Title: Not immune
Country: Canada
Location: Montréal, Québec
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby FiaSpice » 18 Dec 2012, 16:11

Well the rule is, if I remember correctly, no paparazi pictures: where they don't chose to be pictured. The red carpet of Viva Forever, the Burburry shot, when they where on stage for the ROTSG, would be OK because she chose to expose them. That makes sense to me (and I'm no VB fan)
Image
Spice & Solo stuff for sale here
Margaret
Posts: 21332
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Margaret » 18 Dec 2012, 16:12

Drowned wrote:How can she forbid her fans to post pictures of the kids and then make Romeo the face of Burberry? No comments.


I think this came from when there were pictures on the forum with a visibly upset Romeo...
Image
Margaret
Posts: 21332
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Margaret » 03 Feb 2014, 22:38

Oh and due to myself.... LOL, I just read this thread out of boredom and realized I was nearly sued by The Beckhams. Oh my God! How silly was I!?!
Image
User avatar
kittie
Posts: 2629
Joined: 17 Jul 2010, 13:49
Gender: Female

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby kittie » 03 Feb 2014, 22:57

You got almost sued?!?! :D How often did you post a picture of the kids for that?
Margaret
Posts: 21332
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Female

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Margaret » 04 Feb 2014, 07:45

lol! We used to post pictures of the children all the time back in the day but I posted pictures of D, V and Brooklyn that were personal but were posted on the photographers website... :shrug:
Image
herman22j
Posts: 1389
Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 11:17
Gender: Male
Country: Netherlands
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby herman22j » 12 May 2014, 20:29

Drowned wrote:How can she forbid her fans to post pictures of the kids and then make Romeo the face of Burberry? No comments.


nuff said
NUFF SAID
User avatar
biMIXer
Posts: 9107
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: Viva Forever
Location: Spiceworld
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby biMIXer » 17 Aug 2014, 04:59

Im not interested in her boys or her husband, Ive always come to denden for Victoria.
Image
User avatar
Vomiting Porpoise
Posts: 28329
Joined: 12 May 2005, 17:27
Gender: Male
Country: United_Kingdom
Location: UK

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Vomiting Porpoise » 22 Aug 2014, 12:27

biMIXer wrote:Im not interested in her boys or her husband, Ive always come to denden for Victoria.


(:
Image
doodoofan
Posts: 59
Joined: 06 Aug 2006, 19:34
Location: Vietnam
Contact:

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby doodoofan » 01 Sep 2014, 10:12

I understand Victoria and David's reasons. They just want to protect their kids. But forbidding members of one forum to post their kids' photos doesn't help when thousands of websites and blogs out there are doing it.
Rocky
Posts: 5380
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Rocky » 22 Dec 2015, 00:36

I declare that is rule/injunction is outdated, irrelevant and needs revisiting. This is not because I intend to post pictures nor do I care about the Beckham kids YET they are turning into stars in their own right. Buzzfeed has had any number of posts on Brooklyn with the most memorable being Brooklyn bragging about his one million followers only to be interrupted by David Beckham declaring his own 70Mill+ followers.

Yesterday I was scrolling though Jamie Cullum's twitter and there is some song featuring Romeo Beckham. Yes, Romeo was all dressed up walking about town.
User avatar
do-it
Posts: 727
Joined: 16 Jan 2014, 10:58

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby do-it » 22 Dec 2015, 02:21

Wow, just scrolling back through this thread... I've no intention of posting any kids pictures, but what with Brooklyn Bieber the Instagram star, Romeo on the Burberry billboards, Cruz (I think) in David's Homme fragrance TV ad, and Harper being paraded in front of the paparazzi in airport departure halls before she was even out of nappies, the Karbeckhiams are such hypocrites.
User avatar
Vomiting Porpoise
Posts: 28329
Joined: 12 May 2005, 17:27
Gender: Male
Country: United_Kingdom
Location: UK

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Vomiting Porpoise » 17 Apr 2016, 10:18

This article makes a nonsense of this 'ban'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... -book.html

They are all posting all over social media left right and centre. Not that I give a toss about any of them, but the hypocrisy is galling x
Image
User avatar
Javi
Posts: 32957
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: f.k.a. IER
Location: Bitchland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Javi » 12 Jul 2016, 17:55

People in 2016 commenting on an outdated 2009 rule and complaining about VB as if she even remembers this place was almost sued.
-If you really bug me, then I'll say goodbye.
User avatar
Hannes84
Posts: 353
Joined: 30 Aug 2016, 09:34
Gender: Male
Custom Title: ChiariWarrior
Country: Finland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Hannes84 » 09 Sep 2016, 13:24

Javi wrote:People in 2016 commenting on an outdated 2009 rule and complaining about VB as if she even remembers this place was almost sued.

Is this an outdated rule, though? Why is is still stickied then? Anyway I don't think there's any law that forbids linking to a website, unless it's a private and hidden link- then there might be some way to sue. But public links and pages are free for anyone to post - if we're talking about law-side of things. Of course, if the forum rules deny this - we must follow that.
Image
I often look upon the stars, darling. Which one's yours?
User avatar
Javi
Posts: 32957
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: f.k.a. IER
Location: Bitchland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Javi » 09 Sep 2016, 13:32

It's an outdated rule the moment Victoria Beckham herself posts pictures of her kids on social media, takes them to premieres and events and some of them have done modeling pictures for different brands, even magazine covers. Brooklyn has his own Instagram public account, so posting his pictures here will hardly be against the rules.

Nowadays that rule probably only applies to Harper. That's the only kid that Victoria hasn't really been posting that much pictures of.

Also, the rule appeared when DD was a huge community and a reference point for SG and VB fans. Nowadays it's an almost dead community. I doubt Victoria Beckham's lawyers even remember this place at all, and if they do I doubt they will try to sue Dennis if someone posts a picture that has also been posted on Victoria's or Brooklyn's or David's social media, or a picture from a premiere/event where her kids faces have been displayed on purpose in front of cameras and flashes.
-If you really bug me, then I'll say goodbye.
User avatar
Hannes84
Posts: 353
Joined: 30 Aug 2016, 09:34
Gender: Male
Custom Title: ChiariWarrior
Country: Finland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Hannes84 » 09 Sep 2016, 13:47

Javi wrote:It's an outdated rule the moment Victoria Beckham herself posts pictures of her kids on social media, takes them to premieres and events and some of them have done modeling pictures for different brands, even magazine covers. Brooklyn has his own Instagram public account, so posting his pictures here will hardly be against the rules.

Nowadays that rule probably only applies to Harper. That's the only kid that Victoria hasn't really been posting that much pictures of.

Also, the rule appeared when DD was a huge community and a reference point for SG and VB fans. Nowadays it's an almost dead community. I doubt Victoria Beckham's lawyers even remember this place at all, and if they do I doubt they will try to sue Dennis if someone posts a picture that has also been posted on Victoria's or Brooklyn's or David's social media, or a picture from a premiere/event where her kids faces have been displayed on purpose in front of cameras and flashes.

Well then I guess someone should delete this thread. Or at least make it known it's not a rule anymore.
Image
I often look upon the stars, darling. Which one's yours?
User avatar
Javi
Posts: 32957
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: f.k.a. IER
Location: Bitchland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Javi » 09 Sep 2016, 13:49

Hannes84 wrote:
Javi wrote:It's an outdated rule the moment Victoria Beckham herself posts pictures of her kids on social media, takes them to premieres and events and some of them have done modeling pictures for different brands, even magazine covers. Brooklyn has his own Instagram public account, so posting his pictures here will hardly be against the rules.

Nowadays that rule probably only applies to Harper. That's the only kid that Victoria hasn't really been posting that much pictures of.

Also, the rule appeared when DD was a huge community and a reference point for SG and VB fans. Nowadays it's an almost dead community. I doubt Victoria Beckham's lawyers even remember this place at all, and if they do I doubt they will try to sue Dennis if someone posts a picture that has also been posted on Victoria's or Brooklyn's or David's social media, or a picture from a premiere/event where her kids faces have been displayed on purpose in front of cameras and flashes.

Well then I guess someone should delete this thread. Or at least make it known it's not a rule anymore.

Or maybe someone shouldn't make such a big deal about it and use common sense to know when it's ok to post a picture and when it's not. :shrug:
-If you really bug me, then I'll say goodbye.
User avatar
Hannes84
Posts: 353
Joined: 30 Aug 2016, 09:34
Gender: Male
Custom Title: ChiariWarrior
Country: Finland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Hannes84 » 09 Sep 2016, 13:51

Javi wrote:
Hannes84 wrote:
Javi wrote:It's an outdated rule the moment Victoria Beckham herself posts pictures of her kids on social media, takes them to premieres and events and some of them have done modeling pictures for different brands, even magazine covers. Brooklyn has his own Instagram public account, so posting his pictures here will hardly be against the rules.

Nowadays that rule probably only applies to Harper. That's the only kid that Victoria hasn't really been posting that much pictures of.

Also, the rule appeared when DD was a huge community and a reference point for SG and VB fans. Nowadays it's an almost dead community. I doubt Victoria Beckham's lawyers even remember this place at all, and if they do I doubt they will try to sue Dennis if someone posts a picture that has also been posted on Victoria's or Brooklyn's or David's social media, or a picture from a premiere/event where her kids faces have been displayed on purpose in front of cameras and flashes.

Well then I guess someone should delete this thread. Or at least make it known it's not a rule anymore.

Or maybe someone shouldn't make such a big deal about it and use common sense to know when it's ok to post a picture and when it's not. :shrug:

I never did, so no idea what you on about. If it's stickied on this forum, despite when it was posted, it applies. If not, it should be removed.
Image
I often look upon the stars, darling. Which one's yours?
User avatar
Javi
Posts: 32957
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: f.k.a. IER
Location: Bitchland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Javi » 09 Sep 2016, 13:55

Hannes84 wrote:
Javi wrote:
Hannes84 wrote:
Javi wrote:It's an outdated rule the moment Victoria Beckham herself posts pictures of her kids on social media, takes them to premieres and events and some of them have done modeling pictures for different brands, even magazine covers. Brooklyn has his own Instagram public account, so posting his pictures here will hardly be against the rules.

Nowadays that rule probably only applies to Harper. That's the only kid that Victoria hasn't really been posting that much pictures of.

Also, the rule appeared when DD was a huge community and a reference point for SG and VB fans. Nowadays it's an almost dead community. I doubt Victoria Beckham's lawyers even remember this place at all, and if they do I doubt they will try to sue Dennis if someone posts a picture that has also been posted on Victoria's or Brooklyn's or David's social media, or a picture from a premiere/event where her kids faces have been displayed on purpose in front of cameras and flashes.

Well then I guess someone should delete this thread. Or at least make it known it's not a rule anymore.

Or maybe someone shouldn't make such a big deal about it and use common sense to know when it's ok to post a picture and when it's not. :shrug:

I never did, so no idea what you on about. If it's stickied on this forum, despite when it was posted, it applies. If not, it should be removed.


You are making a big deal the moment you ask for a rule to be removed cause you can't use your common sense.
-If you really bug me, then I'll say goodbye.
User avatar
Hannes84
Posts: 353
Joined: 30 Aug 2016, 09:34
Gender: Male
Custom Title: ChiariWarrior
Country: Finland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Hannes84 » 09 Sep 2016, 13:57

Javi wrote:
Hannes84 wrote:
Javi wrote:
Hannes84 wrote:Well then I guess someone should delete this thread. Or at least make it known it's not a rule anymore.

Or maybe someone shouldn't make such a big deal about it and use common sense to know when it's ok to post a picture and when it's not. :shrug:

I never did, so no idea what you on about. If it's stickied on this forum, despite when it was posted, it applies. If not, it should be removed.


You are making a big deal the moment you ask for a rule to be removed cause you can't use your common sense.

Nah I'm not. I'm disagreeing with your points. Making a big deal about it would be creating a new topic or PMing every mod about some rule I don't really care about as I don't give a damn about pictures of VB nor her family. Was just curious, that's all.
Image
I often look upon the stars, darling. Which one's yours?
User avatar
Javi
Posts: 32957
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: f.k.a. IER
Location: Bitchland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Javi » 09 Sep 2016, 14:00

Image
-If you really bug me, then I'll say goodbye.
User avatar
Hannes84
Posts: 353
Joined: 30 Aug 2016, 09:34
Gender: Male
Custom Title: ChiariWarrior
Country: Finland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Hannes84 » 09 Sep 2016, 14:02

Javi wrote:Image

You have to power, use it. Instead of arguing with everyone all the time about the smallest things you can come up with.
Image
I often look upon the stars, darling. Which one's yours?
User avatar
Javi
Posts: 32957
Joined: 28 Jun 2004, 02:32
Gender: Male
Custom Title: f.k.a. IER
Location: Bitchland

Re: Once again: NO KIDS PICTURES!

Postby Javi » 09 Sep 2016, 14:05

lol

The only person I have argued with since you joined the forums 9 days ago is you, honey. And I haven't been the only one you have argued with, so... Do your math.

You've been 9 days here and I already know 5 users that can't stand you. Probably the same amount of haters I collected in more than 10 years.
-If you really bug me, then I'll say goodbye.

Return to “Victoria Beckham”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests